Search
Close this search box.
20180507-Yearbook2017-e-1
Picture of ELZABURU
ELZABURU

Incidence of the coexistence of two opposing trademarks in one part of the EU for the purposes of assessing the likelihood of confusion between said trademarks in other Member States. Judgment of the Court of Justice of July 20, 2017, Kerrygold (C-93/16

Commentary on case C-93/16 on the coexistence of two brands in an EU country.

Posted by Elzaburu
English version «Impact of the coexistence of two conflicting trademarks in one part of the EU on the assessment of the likelihood of confusion between those marks in other Member States. Judgment of the Court of Justice on 20 July 2017, Kerrygold (C-93/16)»
Text accessible at: https://www.elzaburu.com/es/area-de-documentacion/anuario-elzaburu
Also accessible in the Law & ICT section of El Derecho: https://elderecho.com/incidencia-la-coexistencia-dos-marcas-enfrentadas-una-parte-la-ue-efectos-la-apreciacion-del-riesgo- confusion-said-brands-other-member-states-court-ruling

Source: ELZABURU Yearbook of European jurisprudence on industrial and intellectual property, 2017, pp. 24-28

Author/s: Enrique Armijo Chávarri

Share post →

Maybe you might be interested ...